Accusations, accusations, always accusations
rms at gnu.org
Wed Oct 27 14:57:10 UTC 1999
This thread seems to be about giving credit to the GNU effort, while the
above statement suggest that Linus' contribution was just a snap or some
strike of luck.
That's exactly what it was. Linus was not aiming or planning to help
complete a free operating system. He wrote a kernel for completely
different reasons. The fact that it was then useful for producing a
free operating system was a happy accident in terms of his motives.
I don't consider this a criticism; some of my projects, such as the
original Emacs, were happy accidents too.
Is it really necessary to play down some one else's
contribution to justify the GNU/Linux name?
I am sorry you feel that this is "playing down". Pointing out the
reasons why Linus wrote Linux does not alter the merits of Linux as a
technical contribution. My point is about how a different
contribution, the vision of a complete free system, came from the GNU
More information about the License-discuss