support requirement

[Seth David Schoen]

Dj writes:

> > Just because something is released under an Open Source license does not
> > guarantee its the unconditional embrace by the community.  Choosing a
> > standard free license is one thing that could help on that score.
> 
> But then, if the license is open source or a standard open source license, we
> still have the possibility that it will *still* get reimplemented. Remember that
> we started here with the suggestion that the GPL was "magic pixie dust" in
> terms of community acceptance.

Right, so I was thinking of "standard free license" narrowly.

-- 
                    Seth David Schoen <schoen at loyalty.org>
      They said look at the light we're giving you,  /  And the darkness
      that we're saving you from.   -- Dar Williams, "The Great Unknown"
  http://ishmael.geecs.org/~sigma/  (personal)  http://www.loyalty.org/  (CAF)