[CAVO] Definition of "open source software"

[Brian J. Fox]

I don’t get it — why not?  The constitution is declaring that the license must be "open source," so why not define it as copyleft (btw, I care about copyleft, not about GPL specifically).

> On Jan 15, 2018, at 2:51 PM, Lawrence Rosen <lrosen at rosenlaw.com> wrote:
> 
> But the California Constitution shouldn't declare that the open source license MUST be copyleft.

Thanks,

Brian
--
Brian J. Fox
Founder/CEO
Opus Logica, Inc.
A: 901 Olive St., 93101
O: 76-BAFFLE-76
C: 805.637.8642

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/cavo_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20180115/e0f7a866/attachment-0001.html>