[CAVO] Definition of "open source software"

[Brian J. Fox]

"or other consideration" means that they don’t have to make their changes to the software open source as well.  That’s a fail in my book.

> On Jan 13, 2018, at 2:59 PM, Lawrence Rosen <lrosen at rosenlaw.com> wrote:
> 
> Colleagues:
>  
> The following definition is being proposed for the California Constitution in a voter initiative to fund the development of open source election software in this state:
>  
> “Open source software” means software actually distributed to the public under software licenses that provide that every licensee is free to make copies of the software or derivative works thereof, to distribute them without payment of royalties or other consideration, and to access and use the complete source code of the software.
>  
> Comments?
>  
> /Larry
>  
> Lawrence Rosen
> Rosenlaw (www.rosenlaw.com <http://www.rosenlaw.com/>) 
> 3001 King Ranch Rd., Ukiah, CA 95482
> Cell: 707-478-8932 
> This email is licensed under CC-BY-4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>. Please copy freely.  <image001.png>
>  
> _______________________________________________
> CAVO mailing list
> CAVO at lists.opensource.org <mailto:CAVO at lists.opensource.org>
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/cavo_lists.opensource.org <http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/cavo_lists.opensource.org>
Thanks,

Brian
--
Brian J. Fox
Founder/CEO
Opus Logica, Inc.
A: 901 Olive St., 93101
O: 76-BAFFLE-76
C: 805.637.8642

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/cavo_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20180115/54172049/attachment.html>