[CAVO] Senate statement - Elections Committee

[Brent Turner]

Yes David - There is a Santa Claus.

The  first point of interest was when the Senator asked the panelists from
Verified Voting  etc Smith and Alexander if there was any group advocating
the pooling of resources by counties --  They sidestepped the question even
though I had just briefed them

You'll see I was fairly irritated when I finally spoke-- I called for sworn
testimony moving forward so as to avoid the gaming of the environment by
the " usual suspects "

BT





On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:07 PM, David RR Webber (XML) <david at drrw.info>
wrote:

> Brent,
>
> Is there anything of interest here? Usually these hearing rubber stamp
> some funding, and rearrange the deck chairs on the ship, along with
> replacing the funnel with a different one.
>
> David
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [CAVO] Senate statement - Elections Committee
> From: Brent Turner <turnerbrentm at gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, March 11, 2016 6:59 pm
> To: CAVO <CAVO at opensource.org>
>
> My statement at 1:57 : 30
>
>
>
> http://senate.ca.gov/media-archive?title=Senate+Elections+and+Constitutional+Amendments+Committee&startdate%5Bvalue%5D%5Bdate%5D=03-01-2016&enddate%5Bvalue%5D%5Bdate%5D=03-01-2016#
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> CAVO mailing list
> CAVO at opensource.org
> https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cavo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CAVO mailing list
> CAVO at opensource.org
> https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cavo
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/cavo_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20160311/6fb4ff56/attachment.html>