[CAVO] FW: Link to SF - LAFCO open source voting draft

[Lawrence Rosen]

[Forwarding to the list FYI. /Larry]

 

 

From: Fried, Jason (BOS) [mailto:jason.fried at sfgov.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 11:46 AM
To: lrosen at rosenlaw.com
Subject: RE: [CAVO] Link to SF - LAFCO open source voting draft

 

Thanks for your comments.  I am going to compile all the comments submitted in a few weeks and get back to you if I have any questions.

 

 

Jason Fried

Executive Officer

San Francisco Local Agency Formation Commission

415-554-6756

 

From: Lawrence Rosen [mailto:lrosen at rosenlaw.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 12:36 PM
To: 'CAVO'
Cc: Fried, Jason (BOS); Lawrence Rosen
Subject: RE: [CAVO] Link to SF - LAFCO open source voting draft

 

Actually, Brent, I always give you my permission to forward my cavo@ email to Jason Fried. I'll forward this one myself. :-) 

 

And please ask Jason to subscribe to our list to make this easier. (See the link at the bottom of this email.) With good participation here like we're getting this morning, we'll all learn good things about open source voting.

 

Thanks! /Larry

 

[Licensed CC-BY 4.0. Copy with my permission.]

 

Lawrence Rosen

Rosenlaw & Einschlag ( <http://www.rosenlaw.com/> www.rosenlaw.com) 

3001 King Ranch Rd., Ukiah, CA 95482

Cell: 707-478-8932 

LinkedIn:  <http://lnkd.in/D9CWhD> http://lnkd.in/D9CWhD 

 

From: Brent Turner [mailto:turnerbrentm at gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 12:19 PM
To: Lawrence Rosen; CAVO
Subject: Re: [CAVO] Link to SF - LAFCO open source voting draft

 

So the CAVO preference of GPLv3 should be expressed to SF / LAFCO for inclusion on their revision ?   Perhaps you can send that note or give direction 

 

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Lawrence Rosen <lrosen at rosenlaw.com <mailto:lrosen at rosenlaw.com> > wrote:

Brent Turner wrote:

> My understanding is GPLv3 is the CAVO preference from OSI standards..

 Yes, for reasons relating to reassurance that all derivative works will be acceptable for voting around the world. The "strength" and "popularity" of the GPLv3 make it a good license for universal voting software.

 But that doesn't mean that the GPLv3 must be the only open source license used for free software. 

 ALL OSI-approved licenses are open source. Other licenses are not.

 /Larry 

From: Brent Turner [mailto: <mailto:turnerbrentm at gmail.com> turnerbrentm at gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 9:08 AM
To: Patrick Masson; CAVO
Subject: Re: [CAVO] Link to SF - LAFCO open source voting draft

 

My understanding is GPLv3 is the CAVO preference from OSI standards..  

 If this is correct then perhaps others here should apprise LAFCO so as to clarify the best direction for SF 

 Those attempting to insert confusion via non open source " sound-alike " code/ licenses should be anticipated. 


_______________________________________________
CAVO mailing list
CAVO at opensource.org <mailto:CAVO at opensource.org> 
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cavo

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/cavo_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20150526/1d97b62c/attachment.html>