[CAVO] Link to SF - LAFCO open source voting draft
Patrick Masson
masson at opensource.org
Wed May 20 15:18:17 UTC 2015
David,
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 07:53 -0700, David RR Webber (XML) wrote:
> Masson,
>
> Excellent feedback. Does the OSI have a reference white paper or web
> page resources on this we can reference?
Here is some general information in our FAQ:
http://opensource.org/faq#approved-licenses-only
Interestingly, as this appears to be increasing (i.e.
governments/agencies looking to adopt "open source software") we have
begun cataloging policies/laws that site the OSI and OSI Approved
Licenses as a determiner of software being open source or not. This is
here: http://opensource.org/authority
There are many more, but we have yet to capture them all. This is a
summer intern project :-)
> "Open source software; A term used to describe software caring and OSI
> Approved Open Source License."
>
> I think there is a typo - this should be
>
> "Open source software; A term used to describe software carrying an
> OSI Approved Open Source License."
Well we are a caring group, but yes that was a typo!
> David
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [CAVO] Link to SF - LAFCO open source voting
> draft
> From: Patrick Masson <masson at opensource.org>
> Date: Wed, May 20, 2015 10:29 am
> To: CAVO <cavo at opensource.org>
>
> Brent,
>
> I was looking over the document you referenced and had a few
> questions/concerns.
>
> Page one provides definitions including, "Open source: A term
> signifying the source code would be publicly available." This
> is an incomplete definition. It would be better to simply
> state, "Open source software; A term used to describe software
> caring and OSI Approved Open Source License." This definition
> would ensure that all of the attributes of the Open Source
> Definition, not just access to the code, are included in the
> definition.
>
> Page eight states, "Open source software is classified as a
> GPL; hence all improved versions of the original software must
> remain free, disallowing proprietary companies to adopt the
> software, make changes, and sell it on their own terms." This
> is not accurate. Open source software is software distributed
> with an OSI Approved Open Source License, and includes
> permissive licenses. Narrowly defining open source as only
> software caring a GPL or copyleft license does not reflect the
> open source software movement.
>
> Is there an opportunity to provide feedback? If so would
> you/CAVO be able to introduce these? The OSI is constantly
> challenged with the misuse of the term open source software
> and we strive to ensure that only software caring an OSI
> approved license uses the label. We see a lot of open washing
> and fauxpen source out there. While this is obviously not the
> case here, and it's clear folks are genuinely interested in
> working with authentic open source projects, it would be best
> to ensure constancy to avoid misunderstandings.
>
> Thanks,
> Patrick
>
>
> On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 16:58 -0700, Brent Turner wrote:
>
> > http://www.sfbos.org/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=52577
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CAVO mailing list
> > CAVO at opensource.org
> > http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cavo
>
>
> --
> || | | |||| || || | |||| ||| |
> |||
> Patrick Masson
> General Manager & Director
> Open Source Initiative
> 855 El Camino Real, Ste 13A, #270
> Palo Alto, CA 94301
> United States
> OSI Phone: (415) 857-5398
> Direct Phone: (970) 4MASSON
> Skype: massonpj
> Em: masson at opensource.org
> Ws: www.opensource.org
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> CAVO mailing list
> CAVO at opensource.org
> http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cavo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CAVO mailing list
> CAVO at opensource.org
> http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cavo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/cavo_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20150520/ce36eed9/attachment.html>
More information about the CAVO
mailing list