<p dir="ltr">FYI I have submitted a talk to cover the fiduciary umbrellas that are starting in Europe and I'd be happy to represent them here too (mine is called "Public Software CIC").</p>
<p dir="ltr">S,<br>
</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 23 May 2016 15:14, "Deb Nicholson" <<a href="mailto:deb@eximiousproductions.com">deb@eximiousproductions.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">As time runs short, if like to see if we can go with who we have on board already plus possibly one more. </p>
<p dir="ltr">Karen "from charitable" <br>
Duane "from corporate"<br>
Deb Bryant "OSI board member - public policy"<br>
Stefano (if he is willing) "from education and the Debian development/contibutor community"</p>
<p dir="ltr">As chair of the working group, I'd be happy to moderate. <br>
Thanks,<br>
Deb <br>
</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On May 23, 2016 2:30 PM, "Deb Nicholson" <<a href="mailto:deb@eximiousproductions.com" target="_blank">deb@eximiousproductions.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">Breadth would seem incomplete to me without a staff person from a charitable non-profit. We could probably get an industry/board member to cover two hats at once -- especially on this list. :)</p>
<p dir="ltr">I'm also a bit wary of the word developer in this context, since it tends to mean code-only contributors and would prefer the more general word "contributor" for that perspective. <br>
</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On May 23, 2016 2:17 PM, "O'Brien, Duane" <<a href="mailto:duobrien@paypal.com" target="_blank">duobrien@paypal.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:14px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<div>I like the look of #3 as well. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>My first swipe at a panel with some breadth would be to include a developer, a board member, someone from a corporation, and someone in the devrel or community space.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>What does a wide breadth of panelists look like to the rest of you?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span>
<div style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:11pt;text-align:left;color:black;BORDER-BOTTOM:medium none;BORDER-LEFT:medium none;PADDING-BOTTOM:0in;PADDING-LEFT:0in;PADDING-RIGHT:0in;BORDER-TOP:#b5c4df 1pt solid;BORDER-RIGHT:medium none;PADDING-TOP:3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span><<a href="mailto:baconandcoconut@gmail.com" target="_blank">baconandcoconut@gmail.com</a>> on behalf of Deb Nicholson <<a href="mailto:deb@eximiousproductions.com" target="_blank">deb@eximiousproductions.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Monday, May 23, 2016 at 11:04 AM<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>Karen Sandler <<a href="mailto:karen@sfconservancy.org" target="_blank">karen@sfconservancy.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>Beyond Licensing Working Group <<a href="mailto:beyond-licensing@opensource.org" target="_blank">beyond-licensing@opensource.org</a>>, "O'Brien, Duane" <<a href="mailto:duobrien@paypal.com" target="_blank">duobrien@paypal.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re: [beyond-licensing] Panel Discussion at OSCON EU?<br>
</div><div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p dir="ltr">Hi,<br>
I just reread the thread (some things got sick in spam ) and realized you may be proposing something more specific/general about the Beyond Licensing work group.
</p>
<p dir="ltr">I see a few possibilities. <br>
1) Report on the working groups' work which may be tricky depending on how much progress/consensus we've had by October. At the very least, it would have to be a fairly general proposal at this stage.
</p>
<p dir="ltr">2) Have a second town hall session focused on getting European input. We'd need OSI buy-in and this one might the most sense as a co-located event.
</p>
<p dir="ltr">3) Have several different stakeholders discuss what they see as important for the community as we move "Beyond Licensing." I'd want to make sure we got a wide breadth of panelists for this to avoid any feeling that we (some supposed cabal) are
usurping the conversation. </p>
<p dir="ltr">My favorite is number three. I'm here in NY with Deb Bryant who is also willing be involved if we need her.
</p>
<p dir="ltr">Cheers, <br>
Deb </p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On May 23, 2016 1:48 PM, "Deb Nicholson" <<a href="mailto:deb@eximiousproductions.com" target="_blank">deb@eximiousproductions.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<p dir="ltr">I would also be happy to participate. Maybe Deb Bryant could share her text from the OSCON Austin panel for tweaking?
<br>
Cheers, <br>
Deb </p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On May 23, 2016 1:22 PM, "Karen Sandler" <<a href="mailto:karen@sfconservancy.org" target="_blank">karen@sfconservancy.org</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I'm happy to participate if that's helpful :)<br>
<br>
karen<br>
<br>
On 2016-05-23 13:14, O'Brien, Duane wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
(My bad on the bounce, I emailed the bounced address.)<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone<br>
<br>
On May 23, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Allison Randal <<a href="mailto:allison@opensource.org" target="_blank">allison@opensource.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
This message seems to have bounced from the mailing list, not sure why.<br>
Sending it on...<br>
<br>
On 05/23/2016 01:02 PM, O'Brien, Duane wrote:<br>
Hi all.<br>
<br>
We’ve got about six-ish hours left until the CFP for OSCON EU closes. Is<br>
there interest in with working group to put together a panel discussion?<br>
We could present some of the topics we’ve been discussing, any work we<br>
complete to date, take questions, etc. I would be happy to shepherd the<br>
submission through the process, but we’ll need too pull together a<br>
speaker list and an abstract in the next few hours.<br>
<br>
Any takers?<br>
-D<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
beyond-licensing mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:beyond-licensing@opensource.org" target="_blank">beyond-licensing@opensource.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beyond-licensing" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beyond-licensing</a><br>
</blockquote>
_______________________________________________<br>
beyond-licensing mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:beyond-licensing@opensource.org" target="_blank">beyond-licensing@opensource.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beyond-licensing" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beyond-licensing</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></span>
</div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
beyond-licensing mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:beyond-licensing@opensource.org">beyond-licensing@opensource.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beyond-licensing" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beyond-licensing</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>