[beyond-licensing] Panel Discussion at OSCON EU?

O'Brien, Duane duobrien at paypal.com
Mon May 23 18:14:56 UTC 2016


I like the look of #3 as well.

My first swipe at a panel with some breadth would be to include a developer, a board member, someone from a corporation, and someone in the devrel or community space.

What does a wide breadth of panelists look like to the rest of you?

From: <baconandcoconut at gmail.com<mailto:baconandcoconut at gmail.com>> on behalf of Deb Nicholson <deb at eximiousproductions.com<mailto:deb at eximiousproductions.com>>
Date: Monday, May 23, 2016 at 11:04 AM
To: Karen Sandler <karen at sfconservancy.org<mailto:karen at sfconservancy.org>>
Cc: Beyond Licensing Working Group <beyond-licensing at opensource.org<mailto:beyond-licensing at opensource.org>>, "O'Brien, Duane" <duobrien at paypal.com<mailto:duobrien at paypal.com>>
Subject: Re: [beyond-licensing] Panel Discussion at OSCON EU?


Hi,
I just reread the thread (some things got sick in spam ) and realized you may be proposing something more specific/general about the Beyond Licensing work group.

I see a few possibilities.
1) Report on the working groups' work which may be tricky depending on how much progress/consensus we've had by October. At the very least, it would have to be a fairly general proposal at this stage.

2) Have a second town hall session focused on getting European input. We'd need OSI buy-in and this one might the most sense as a co-located event.

3) Have several different stakeholders discuss what they see as important for the community as we move "Beyond Licensing." I'd want to make sure we got a wide breadth of panelists for this to avoid any feeling that we (some supposed cabal) are usurping the conversation.

My favorite is number three. I'm here in NY with Deb Bryant who is also willing be involved if we need her.

Cheers,
Deb

On May 23, 2016 1:48 PM, "Deb Nicholson" <deb at eximiousproductions.com<mailto:deb at eximiousproductions.com>> wrote:

I would also be happy to participate. Maybe Deb Bryant could share her text from the OSCON Austin panel for tweaking?
Cheers,
Deb

On May 23, 2016 1:22 PM, "Karen Sandler" <karen at sfconservancy.org<mailto:karen at sfconservancy.org>> wrote:
I'm happy to participate if that's helpful :)

karen

On 2016-05-23 13:14, O'Brien, Duane wrote:
(My bad on the bounce, I emailed the bounced address.)

Sent from my iPhone

On May 23, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Allison Randal <allison at opensource.org<mailto:allison at opensource.org>> wrote:

This message seems to have bounced from the mailing list, not sure why.
Sending it on...

On 05/23/2016 01:02 PM, O'Brien, Duane wrote:
Hi all.

We've got about six-ish hours left until the CFP for OSCON EU closes. Is
there interest in with working group to put together a panel discussion?
We could present some of the topics we've been discussing, any work we
complete to date, take questions, etc. I would be happy to shepherd the
submission through the process, but we'll need too pull together a
speaker list and an abstract in the next few hours.

Any takers?
-D
_______________________________________________
beyond-licensing mailing list
beyond-licensing at opensource.org<mailto:beyond-licensing at opensource.org>
https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beyond-licensing
_______________________________________________
beyond-licensing mailing list
beyond-licensing at opensource.org<mailto:beyond-licensing at opensource.org>
https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beyond-licensing
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/beyond-licensing_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20160523/f9e0bfb0/attachment.html>


More information about the beyond-licensing mailing list